Rhetorical Analysis Essay Example (With Breakdown)
A rhetorical analysis essay argues about how a text persuades, not whether its argument is correct. The three things it has to do are name the rhetorical strategies at work, show them functioning in specific passages, and argue about whether (and why) they succeed with their intended audience.
Illustrative example — figures, citations, and names may not represent real studies or people. Verify before quoting.
How Reagan's Challenger Address Turned a Disaster into a National Moment
Breakdown
On the evening of January 28, 1986... Reagan postponed the State of the Union and instead delivered a four-minute address from the Oval Office...
Rhetorical analysis essays need enough context for the reader to place the text, but not so much that the context becomes the essay. One paragraph, specific facts, and the writer is ready to analyze.
The speech's first strategy is a refusal to perform management... by not pretending to be in charge of grief, Reagan allows the country to experience his grief alongside theirs...
The essay names a specific strategy and shows how it functions. Weak rhetorical analysis lists devices ("Reagan uses ethos, pathos, and logos") without explaining what they do. Strong analysis explains the mechanism.
Reagan names the seven crew members by name... and then places their deaths in a lineage of exploration: Drake, who died at sea, and the pioneers of powered flight.
The analysis grounds each strategy in specific text. You can go back to the speech and find these moves. This is what separates rhetorical analysis from rhetorical speculation.
Noonan did not invent the phrase; she found it and knew that a speech delivered to a country that had just watched schoolchildren watch their teacher die needed a final image that did not attempt to explain the deaths...
The essay reads the iconic closing line as a technical choice rather than as decoration. Rhetorical analysis at its best shows that the memorable moments are memorable because of specific craft decisions, not because of ineffable rhetorical genius.
What the speech does, taken as a whole, is refuse the three temptations of disaster rhetoric: the temptation to explain, the temptation to reassure, and the temptation to promise action.
Naming what a speech does not do is often more illuminating than naming what it does. This paragraph turns the absence into the argument: Reagan succeeded by refusing three common moves, and the refusal is the craft.
As a model of rhetoric, it succeeds not because it argues well but because it knew which things not to argue at all.
The essay closes with a judgment about the speech's success and names the specific reason. Rhetorical analysis that refuses to evaluate — that only describes — is weaker than analysis that commits to a claim about whether the rhetoric worked.
Writing tips
Pick a text, read it slowly, and name the specific strategies you see. For each, go back to the text and find the passage where the strategy is visible. Resist the temptation to list canonical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) unless you can show what they do in this specific text. Close with a judgment about whether the rhetoric succeeds with its intended audience and why.
Plan your own rhetorical analysis essay.
Write for free — no limits